Back to Modern American Advisor

Alynd is a performance-based client acquisition platform built exclusively for independent advisory firms. You pay only for completed consultations.

The data

What 5,000+ introductions actually reveal.

Three figures drawn from the introductions we have arranged and analysed. Each is presented with an observation, a business implication and a recommended action.

After the cases

What the data tells us.

Three figures drawn from operational data across the introduction network. Each is read the same way: what happened, why it matters to your P&L, and what to do about it.

Figure 01

The referral share of new clients is falling

Across participating firms, the proportion of new relationships originating from client referrals declined steadily over six years — not because referrals stopped, but because the pool generating them stopped expanding.

201978% referral
202171% referral
202363% referral
202554% referral
Referral All other sources
Observation
Referral share of new clients fell 24 points in six years, from 78% to 54%.
Business implication
A firm growing at last year's rate on this mix is losing roughly a quarter of its acquisition engine per cycle without replacing it.
Recommended action
Treat referrals as one channel with a known, declining yield — and budget a second channel against the shortfall.
Figure 02

Average investable assets, by source

Volume and value are not the same measure. Qualified introductions — where circumstances are established before a meeting is booked — carried materially larger average cases than either referrals or inbound digital enquiries.

Referral introduction$410k
Digital enquiry$260k
Qualified introduction$640k
Observation
Qualified introductions averaged $640k per case, 56% above referral and 2.5× digital enquiry.
Business implication
At a 1% fee, twenty qualified meetings a year are worth more in revenue than thirty digital enquiries converted at the same rate.
Recommended action
Measure acquisition by assets per completed meeting, not by enquiries received.
Figure 03

Conversion improves with repetition

Advisers holding first meetings weekly converted at roughly twice the rate of those holding one or two a month. The variable was not talent. It was frequency.

21%
1–2 meetings / month
34%
3–5 meetings / month
47%
6+ meetings / month
Observation
Advisers at 6+ first meetings a month converted at 47%, against 21% for those at 1–2.
Business implication
Under-fed advisers look like underperformers. The cost of low volume is paid twice: in meetings missed and in conversion foregone.
Recommended action
Protect meeting volume as a managed input, and report it per adviser per month alongside revenue.

Figures are illustrative aggregates drawn from platform operational data and are not a projection of results for any individual firm.

Once we knew the cost of a first meeting, every other decision got easier.
Principal, $1.1B AUM firm
Practice

What high-growth firms have in common.

Principle 01

They define the client before they define the campaign

Figure 02 is the argument: assets per completed meeting varies more by definition of the prospect than by channel. High-growth firms write down who they serve — stage, circumstance, complexity — before they spend anything on reaching them.

Principle 02

They treat meeting volume as an operating metric

Conversion improves with repetition. Firms that report first meetings held per adviser per month, alongside revenue, manage the input they can actually control.

Principle 03

They know their cost per completed consultation

A firm that can state this number can model hiring, capacity and margin. A firm that cannot is estimating its own growth from memory.

Principle 04

They pace acquisition to service capacity

The ageing-book case capped introductions deliberately below capacity. Growth that degrades the client experience is borrowed from retention.

Principle 05

They separate referral gratitude from referral strategy

Referrals remain the highest-converting source in most firms. They are simply a channel with a finite, ageing supply — and are budgeted as such rather than relied upon.

Principle 06

They hire against pipeline, not against optimism

The second case study is the counter-example. When demand is measurable, capacity decisions become arithmetic and the cost of a wrong one falls sharply.

Which of these figures is currently working against your firm?

Bring last year's new-client list to the Growth Review and we will read your own numbers against these three.

  • You define your ideal client
  • You control meeting capacity
  • You pause at any time
  • Exclusive introductions
Book an Advisor Growth Review

45 minutes · Confidential · No obligation

Book your Advisor Growth Review

45 minutes · Confidential · No obligation